The launch of BlogEngine.NET

by Mads Kristensen 3. April 2007 04:00

After a lot of hard work I am very please to present the BlogEngine.NET for anyone to download and use. The blog engine is for anyone, but designed specifically to .NET developers that like to push software further than intended.

BlogEngine.NET may be the simplest and most light weight ASP.NET blog at the moment, but still full featured. Here are some of the features:

  1. Multi-author support
  2. Pingbacks and trackbacks
  3. Event based for plug-in writers
  4. Theming directly in master pages and user controls
  5. Gravatar and coComments implemented
  6. Live preview on commenting
  7. Full editing and creation of pages that are not posts
  8. Extended search capabilities
  9. Tag cloud
  10. Self updating blogroll
  11. Runs entirely on XML. No database needed

To get stated using the BlogEngine.NET, go to the website – a website built on the engine.

* Only $4.95/month ASP.NET & Windows 2008 + IIS 7 Hosting! FREE SQL Included

Tags:

BlogEngine | ASP.NET

Comments

4/3/2007 10:23:50 AM #

 Haacked

What's the license for this blog engine?

Haacked |

4/3/2007 10:25:11 AM #

 Haacked

p.s. Congratulations! Smile How rude of me to just ask a question and not offer congrats. ;)

Haacked |

4/3/2007 3:07:28 PM #

Mads Kristensen

Phil, I haven't figured out what license this will fit into. The license must allow redistribution, freedom of total modification but not selling or rebranding. I'll put it on source forge in a short while. I've thought about Microsoft's new license model, but haven't looked into it yet.

Mads Kristensen |

4/3/2007 3:40:55 PM #

Mads Kristensen

I've looked at the Creative Commons Share-Alike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/
I think this will be the one.

Mads Kristensen |

4/3/2007 11:30:10 PM #

 Haacked

Mads, that license would permit others to sell or rebrand your blog engine. Are you sure you don't want to pick an OSI (Open Source Initiative) license from here: http://www.opensource.org/licenses/category

In my opinion, they are better suited for code than creative commons, which I tend to think is better suited towards content and other creative works. However, I should point out this *is* just my opinion and not legal advice. ;)

Subtext uses New BSD which pretty much allows anyone to do anything with the code as long as there is proper attribution and the license stays with the code.

Haacked |

4/4/2007 12:16:52 AM #

Mads Kristensen

Good point. I've taking the advice and changed the licensing to Microsoft Permissive License www.microsoft.com/.../permissivelicense.mspx

Mads Kristensen |

4/18/2007 7:57:25 PM #

Scott Fang

I like it very much.

Scott Fang United States |

10/21/2007 4:17:53 AM #

max

Yes, great site

max Belgium |

Comments are closed

About the slave

Mads Kristensen Mads Kristensen
Web developer at ZYB and founder of BlogEngine.NET. More...

LinkedIn ZYB Facebook Last.fm Twitter View Mads Kristensen's profile on Technorati

The Lounge

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in anyway.

© Copyright 2008